I've seen it used, I thought it's perhaps better but it's not a good term then?
No problem, I'll stick to disabled.
Eseman:
Mind if I ask why? I’ve also heard if used, and I thought it was the inclusive term to use.
There are two (main) 'models' of disability, the 'medical model' and the 'social model'. The former says that a disability is a defect in a person, i.e. they are somehow worse than others, and disabled by their impairment. The latter says that people are 'disabled by barriers in society, not by their impairment or difference'.
'Differently abled' is a different kind of attempt to dismantle the idea that disabled people are disabled because of their impairment, but it doesn't really state that there is such a thing as socially-caused disability.
Disabling people is just a fact of a society that doesn't include everybody, and while it persists, it has to be challenged, but it also has to be seen clearly that it exists and not denied.
JWestland:
Eseman:
There are two (main) 'models' of disability, the 'medical model' and the 'social model'. The former says that a disability is a defect in a person, i.e. they are somehow worse than others, and disabled by their impairment. The latter says that people are 'disabled by barriers in society, not by their impairment or difference'.
https://www.scope.org.uk/about-us/social-model-of-disability/
'Differently abled' is a different kind of attempt to dismantle the idea that disabled people are disabled because of their impairment, but it doesn't really state that there is such a thing as socially-caused disability.
Disabling people is just a fact of a society that doesn't include everybody, and while it persists, it has to be challenged, but it also has to be seen clearly that it exists and not denied.
Thread here:
https://www.lfgss.com/conversations/282967/