Doping

You are reading a single comment by @Mikey51 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

andyp in reply to @Ste_S

Not quite. The tribunal's verdict was that Freeman was found guilty of ordering testosterone for an unknown rider.
You don't have to read anything into it, it's pretty clear.

They have zero evidence to prove this, though. If this was a civil or criminal case, they couldn't have reached this verdict. All they know is that testosterone was ordered and delivered to BC HQ. No evidence has yet been brought into the public domain as to who it was destined for other than Sutton.

Who, we know, used it before when he was a rider.

•

Mikey51 in reply to @andyp

The MPTS is part of the tribunal system. It applies the civil standard of proof. An appeal from it goes to the High Court.

So - this was equivalent to a civil case, and it proceeded along the same lines as, and (in terms of burden and standard of proof) adopted the same approach as any other civil case...

About

@Mikey51 started