You are reading a single comment by @timmah! and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
But the tribunal came down to a question of who was more credible, Freeman or Sutton. I'd argue neither are.
It's clear there was something going on that someone wanted covered up, but exactly what is still unknown. Freeman has taken the blame, but was it really just him acting alone or is there more to it than that? I'd hazard a guess that there was, but we don't know if it was riders being doped or something else, nor who was involved. The UKAD investigation has to be broader than Freeman's involvement.
andyp
@timmah!
I don't agree that whether Shane Sutton is credible or not is the main issue here. Mr Freeman has consistently dodged questions, destroyed records, and done almost everything he could to avoid answering straight questions.