I wouldn't consider the 16-55 a kitlens in terms of size and weight. I personally wouldn't get anything exceeding 2.8 for indoor use.
Haven't used / seen the 16-80 but it does give you that little bit of extra focal length, F4 would be my main concern despite the OIS.
How about the 18-55 kitlens? I've never used it but from what I read it seems to be a lot of bang for your buck.
Yes, I think I was referring to the 18-55, got my numbers all mixed up. The 16-55 2.8 is way out of mybudget.
@swmlon started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
I wouldn't consider the 16-55 a kitlens in terms of size and weight. I personally wouldn't get anything exceeding 2.8 for indoor use.
Haven't used / seen the 16-80 but it does give you that little bit of extra focal length, F4 would be my main concern despite the OIS.
How about the 18-55 kitlens? I've never used it but from what I read it seems to be a lot of bang for your buck.