I totally get not wanting to deviate from the tested 3 week gap, in the absence of having tested anything else, but then to say well, maybe 4 or 5, or possibly 6, is odd without evidence of diminishing returns. Would be interesting to see the full interview
I totally get not wanting to deviate from the tested 3 week gap, in the absence of having tested anything else, but then to say well, maybe 4 or 5, or possibly 6, is odd without evidence of diminishing returns. Would be interesting to see the full interview