Are England basing their declaration decision upon the run total they set India,
or the amount of overs they have with the 2nd new ball to bowl, at hopefully, the Indian tail?
We've been pretty conservative with declarations ever since strauss was captain. I don't think Pant and the Australia series has helped their thinking.
Are England basing their declaration decision upon the run total they set India,
or the amount of overs they have with the 2nd new ball to bowl, at hopefully, the Indian tail?