-
I do hear you, and it's clearly coming for a place of frustration, so I'm not going to respond with anything to make that worse.
I'm not sure if you've investigated it but I think you can instantiate S146 proceedings against a co-freeholder if they're not maintaining their end of the bargain, especially if ground rent is not being paid (assuming you have that), though I am not a lawyer.
ReekBlefs-
I think you can instantiate S146 proceedings against a co-freeholder if they're not maintaining their end of the bargain
Looked at this recently. You can't. Not least because section 146 notices only apply where there's a proviso for re-entry, and that only applies to their obligations as a tenant, not their obligations as co-landlord.
Edited to add: I'm involved in a similar case to grams' at the moment. The only way out of the impasse seems to me to apply under the 1987 Act for the appointment of a manager. Which is a whole world of pain.
Brommers
It turns out if you simply object to everything, refuse to pay and/or be generally unreachable those obligations don't mean a lot. Signed, a joint freeholder.
(doubly so if you're non-resident)