You are reading a single comment by @Brommers and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • yes. I agree I would have a very hard time being unbiased and objective about simply representing for the sake of law when someone is definitely guilty of something terrible.

  • I agree I would have a very hard time being unbiased and objective about simply representing for the sake of law when someone is definitely guilty of something terrible.

    If they're definitely guilty then no-one would be defending them, because there would be no defence.

  • Isn't that a bit of a simplification - even if pleading guilty, anyone would still want good counsel for mitigation, making a case for sentencing etc?

    Which I'd say is still defence

About

Avatar for Brommers @Brommers started