You are reading a single comment by @itsbruce and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Really? That's interesting. So you're not allowed to consider 'reputational damage'
There should be no reputational damage. People have a right to legal representation. Making sure their case is properly argued is a necessity of the legal system. Within the legal profession this is well understood, also among the saner parts of society.
The legal professionals who have damaged their reputation in Trump's defence did so because of the way they behaved while they were doing it, not for the basic fact of acting on his behalf.
itsbruce
Really? That's interesting. So you're not allowed to consider 'reputational damage', or is such a thing not as relevant in light of not being able to choose clients?
(for example, finance here, we have a long list of clients (countries even) we can't deal with due to potential reputational problems).