-
The strongest argument IMO is ride characteristics. A 650x42-47 handles better with drop bars than a 700x42-47. Add full mudguards into the mix and the 650 wins hands down. I say this at 190cm on a frame that could handle 700. IMO/2p/subjective/etc
I think if I was racing a big gravel event like they have in the states where some sections can be quite rocky, without mudguards, I would run a 700x42 for the angle of attack argument, which I think would be valid over a long distance.
But I ride 50/50 on/off road and 650bx42 with full guards is perfect.
Now we’re back on tyres, should we switch back to eviscerating GRX in Feb?
snoops-
I've got gear ratio arguments scheduled for February.
-
The strongest argument IMO is ride characteristics. A 650x42-47 handles better with drop bars than a 700x42-47. Add full mudguards into the mix and the 650 wins hands down. I say this at 190cm on a frame that could handle 700. IMO/2p/subjective/etc.
Not only that, but also the weight, 650b is noticeably lighter than a similar 700c option.
A 650b 48mm tyres weight similar to a 700c 38mm tyres, on top of the wheels tend to be slightly lighter than 700c.
Honestly, unless bicycle like the Trek Checkpoint SL are design with massive 700c in mind, it’s all subjective.
frankenbike
edscoble
He's not really saying much. It's a weight argument when most people don't give two shits about it. Frame manufacturers haven't really struggled to accommodate 700c at all.
700c is better for all unless you're of a shorter stature.
I say as someone who still rides 26".