-
I agree wholeheartedly. I love everything about that watch apart from that “small” problem. And I can’t own a watch I won’t wear.
-
Personally I feel that all collections should have a Submariner and a Speedmaster
😂😂😂
You only say that because you have a sub and a speedy.
I'd like a sub (id prefer a sea Dweller) but I don't think one should definitely have any one watch.
I bet you, even on this biek forum, some of this lot will have a cracking collections, and have neither.
What logic are you following? Most well known watches in various brands? With this logic, you should also have a Nautilus, royal oak and so on.
-
Completely agree that a Submariner and a Speedmaster are absolute classics, maybe equivalent to a Gios Torino Super Recird and a Saronni 1982 Goodwood Colnago Master.
But there are others who could easily enter that conversation - a Ti-Raleigh, a Mapei era Colnago, a Motorola Merckx Corsa Extra, a C
celeste steel Bianchi - so is it the same with watches?(With mountain bikes, the comparators are perhaps RC100, Yo Eddy in grello and a Dolomite Attitude)
So, what apart from a Submariner and a Speedmaster would be added to the “stone cold classics” conversation?
You are reading a single comment by @Dammit and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
PawG
ChainBreaker
Big_Ted
@Dammit
Well if you don't get on with it, get rid. Personally I feel that all collections should have a Submariner and a Speedmaster as they're such classics, but no point owning a watch you don't want to wear.