-
• #16027
27.5" is forever, as long as people are forced to use the same bike both on and off road
-
• #16028
Exactly what someone would say trying to keep it a secret. I'm onto you buddy.
-
• #16029
He's not really saying much. It's a weight argument when most people don't give two shits about it. Frame manufacturers haven't really struggled to accommodate 700c at all.
700c is better for all unless you're of a shorter stature.
I say as someone who still rides 26". -
• #16030
I have a different frame. I just vaguely remembered you talking to hippy about fitting wide tires and i was interested to know if you were using the same guards with them.
Maybe I just craved some more pics of your bike for inspiration.
I think now that I should optimize the fenders for wet road rather than wet off road.
-
• #16031
He’s gone for the breakaway but the fairlights were next choice;
He does fly with the bike at least once a year so that was the main catch with anything else!
-
• #16032
What's the clearance like on the frame?
-
• #16033
I say as someone who still rides 26".
High five.
-
• #16034
The strongest argument IMO is ride characteristics. A 650x42-47 handles better with drop bars than a 700x42-47. Add full mudguards into the mix and the 650 wins hands down. I say this at 190cm on a frame that could handle 700. IMO/2p/subjective/etc
I think if I was racing a big gravel event like they have in the states where some sections can be quite rocky, without mudguards, I would run a 700x42 for the angle of attack argument, which I think would be valid over a long distance.
But I ride 50/50 on/off road and 650bx42 with full guards is perfect.
Now we’re back on tyres, should we switch back to eviscerating GRX in Feb?
-
• #16035
I've got gear ratio arguments scheduled for February.
-
• #16036
Maybe we can talk about how rubbish steel frames are?
-
• #16037
The strongest argument IMO is ride characteristics. A 650x42-47 handles better with drop bars than a 700x42-47. Add full mudguards into the mix and the 650 wins hands down. I say this at 190cm on a frame that could handle 700. IMO/2p/subjective/etc.
Not only that, but also the weight, 650b is noticeably lighter than a similar 700c option.
A 650b 48mm tyres weight similar to a 700c 38mm tyres, on top of the wheels tend to be slightly lighter than 700c.
Honestly, unless bicycle like the Trek Checkpoint SL are design with massive 700c in mind, it’s all subjective.
-
• #16038
Pray for 650b
-
• #16039
Just have a look at what MTB guys ride. 650b it's for tiny bikes.
It's fine for chucking big tires in frames not designed for it though -
• #16040
650bad
700chad
-
• #16041
That comparison is a radical oversimplification. There are many more variables between mtb and gravel to consider that affect wheel diameter decision.
-
• #16042
Just have a look at what MTB guys ride.
Why? They have a different set of problems to solve in the design of those bikes.
I'm with Snoops on this. 650b actually makes sense for both small road & gravel bikes ... but also Road+ bikes if you'd still like a bike nimble (steering and accelerating) at low speeds with less toe overlap.
-
• #16043
Holy smokes.
-
• #16044
I like. A lot.
-
• #16045
taps skull
no need to worry about toe overlap if you don't have to turn
1 Attachment
-
• #16046
700c
Can't turn. Don't want to either.
-
• #16047
Red looks more like the 'falling off' line
-
• #16048
Red is the path my body takes?
Lellow is the path my bike takes? -
• #16050
i would simply hop the big rock
The last thing we need is more conspiracy theories.