-
Is there a suggestion that the govt has acted illegally / against planning, or have they perhaps used a method that wouldn't be available to someone trying to build a conservatory? I don't think the article said (or didn't understand it if it did).
Still, the schadenfreude is strong with those kind of articles. In my head I assume that the pensioner who only wanted to retire in his cottage in peace and quiet next to a lovely visitor centre for the castle would have voted leave; I wish the journalists would ask sometimes - it would make a difference to my reception of the articles.
Irrespective of how they voted, why should the government be able to fast track a facility like that without following the normal planning process?