Is it not just a case of Trump violating their terms of service, that he agreed to when he signed up? He's not had his freedom of speech taken away - he's free to use any service that is willing to serve him. Surely it would only become a freedom of speech issue if the law intervened?
Is twitter not like a big megaphone (to use a crude analogy). Taking a megaphone away from someone does not silence them, it just makes them quieter.
If someone wants to print a book denying the Holocaust, that is within their right to free speech, but a printer is not violating their human rights by refusing to print that book.
Or if someone loves smearing shit all over themselves, fine to do it at home, but if you start doing it in Littlechef you'll probably be refused service.
Is it not just a case of Trump violating their terms of service, that he agreed to when he signed up? He's not had his freedom of speech taken away - he's free to use any service that is willing to serve him. Surely it would only become a freedom of speech issue if the law intervened?
Is twitter not like a big megaphone (to use a crude analogy). Taking a megaphone away from someone does not silence them, it just makes them quieter.
If someone wants to print a book denying the Holocaust, that is within their right to free speech, but a printer is not violating their human rights by refusing to print that book.
Or if someone loves smearing shit all over themselves, fine to do it at home, but if you start doing it in Littlechef you'll probably be refused service.