-
Clearly banning Hilter from public speaking in 1925 didn’t stop him or his ideas being a problem.
The best argument I heard for not banning Trump from Twitter was:
“Let him speak, enforce the law - prosecute him for inciting violence”
As an ideal I can’t fault that but it ignores some practicalities specific to Trump (it’s not a crime in the US to incite violence and the President has immunity to prosecution).
-
When this all comes out in the wash, you will look back at Biden and DT and the history
books will record DT as the hero and Biden as the villain. I know that seems
incomprehensible to you now.
You only see history when you look back in hindsight.With this insight into hindsight, could your facebook contact please provide some lottery winning ticket numbers for the next few months? Asking for a friend...
Just had a mind-bending exchange with someone on facebook. Over the last 10 months he's gone from a lockdown critic to full blown conspiracy theorist, which has also led him to believe that Trump has had the election stolen from him and that Amazon, Apple, Google etc pulling support for Parler is an attack on free speech.
I pointed out that Hitler was also banned from public speaking in 1925, and asked whether he would have supported his right to free speech at that time. His response in full: