You are reading a single comment by @Oliver Schick and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Interesting, thanks for the link.

    "It has a slightly odd length at 30.5m, which makes the maths a bit tricky when trying to work out how far I’ve swum’"

    Only if you think of it in meters. 30.5m will be a 33+1/3 yard pool so 3 lengths is 100 yards.

    Also:-

    "
    Staff have been keeping the temperature at the usual 29C (84F) during lockdown
    ...
    ‘I always find this pool a bit on the cold side when I swim here, but the colder water does seem to sharpen up the stroke somehow’
    "

    29oC cold for an indoor pool? What kind of insanity is that? Most aim for 26oC-28oC (and Olympic pool regs are 25oC-28oC.) I hate pools when they're too warm.

  • I find it persistently annoying that the [sup]o[/sup] isn't available on UK keyboards. As a symbol, º is called the 'masculine ordinal indicator' in LibreOffice, as I just discovered when I copied it across.

    Good point about the measurement, but slightly more simply, 30.5 (strictly speaking 30.48m) is 100 feet. 1 yard is 3 feet, so the primary measure that those who devised the pool length were thinking about was clearly feet. Good to see that the pool is still flying the flag for metric martyrism. :)

    Yes, that remark about the temperature mystified me, too. I can only imagine that he must mean the air temperature--29ºC as water temperature is *really* warm.

  • so the primary measure that those who devised the pool length were thinking about was clearly feet

    No. My local pool is 33+1/3m long (as is the one I grew swimming in 30+ years ago). There's no metric equivalent of a 1/3m so that argument falls away. It's purely so that you swim a specific distance in a whole number of lengths. Most pools built nowadays are 25m, 33+1/3m or 50m for this very reason. Other lengths are generally due to space constraints.

    The pool in question was obviously built when swim distances were based on yards.

About