-
One of the things I am finding most imteresting are the Trump fans who are still posting "evidence" of fraud that is so thoroughly debunked you can only assume that they have just enough cognitive ability to breath and blink at the same time and nothing else.
So many people posting screenshots of erroneous court filings that have already been laughed out of court for using data from the wrong states for example. Or screenshots of tweets that were written using data from the primaries and not the main election. And when somebody points them towards a Reuters article explaining why this "evidence" is false they just dismisss Reuters as a liberal conspiracy agency.
There are some really fucked up people in this world. More than I realised.
Sad reality is that many Americans share articles based on the headline alone - most times the content of the article isn't even read, much less investigated by the people sharing it.
You are reading a single comment by @JVBulman and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
JVBulman
One of the things I am finding most imteresting are the Trump fans who are still posting "evidence" of fraud that is so thoroughly debunked you can only assume that they have just enough cognitive ability to breath and blink at the same time and nothing else.
So many people posting screenshots of erroneous court filings that have already been laughed out of court for using data from the wrong states for example. Or screenshots of tweets that were written using data from the primaries and not the main election. And when somebody points them towards a Reuters article explaining why this "evidence" is false they just dismisss Reuters as a liberal conspiracy agency.
There are some really fucked up people in this world. More than I realised.