Seriously? So even if you get vaccinated, you only have roughly a 50% less chance of getting the flu?
But that becomes material if it means everyone infects half the number of people.
If R is 1.5 for example, and you start with 100 people with the virus, after 5 rounds you'd have 10*(1.5^5) = 75.9 infections.
With a 50% effective vaccine then that 1.5 I'd have thought becomes 0.75, so after 5 rounds the 10 people with the virus is 2
(I'm sure I've vastly simplified things, but a number that doesn't look too spectacular from the point of view of one person can actually be significant when applied to an exponential spread across a population)
Edit: the above assumes the entire population have received the vaccine, which is unrealistic. But principle is still there
But that becomes material if it means everyone infects half the number of people.
If R is 1.5 for example, and you start with 100 people with the virus, after 5 rounds you'd have 10*(1.5^5) = 75.9 infections.
With a 50% effective vaccine then that 1.5 I'd have thought becomes 0.75, so after 5 rounds the 10 people with the virus is 2
(I'm sure I've vastly simplified things, but a number that doesn't look too spectacular from the point of view of one person can actually be significant when applied to an exponential spread across a population)
Edit: the above assumes the entire population have received the vaccine, which is unrealistic. But principle is still there