-
Doesn't sound great.
Serious question: why not? Lots of vaccines have a protocol that calls for multiple doses and/or booster shots.
(Edit: if we're talking about the one-shot efficacy not sounding great, then there's a logistics trade-off; the Oxford vaccine doesn't require extreme cold storage, so swings and roundabouts...)
-
Doesn't sound great.
Sounds pretty fucking normal. Gore-Tex was invented due to a combination of frustration and serendipity. If it works, it works. How it's got there is a side issue.
Can we choose which of the vaccines to get?
No. But you can check your entitlement.
-
Can we choose which of the vaccines to get?
I assume not. At first.
A year down the line they might be available privately like the flu vaccine is. At that point you could pay and have them all!
You are reading a single comment by @Lebowski and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Thrustvector
Brommers
jellybaby
@Lebowski
So the Oxford vaccine has an efficacy of 62% when administered the way they planned it. It was only by mistakenly giving a group of participants a first half dose that efficacy rose to 90%. Doesn't sound great.
Can we choose which of the vaccines to get?