Analog film photography and cameras

You are reading a single comment by @doug1e and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

miro_o

Another way to look at it:

Scan 1 can look like scan 2 in processing easily, with detail to spare. Scan 2 has almost no room for improvement in processing. Which is the better scan?

•

doug1e in reply to @miro_o

Scan 1 is a 2000x3000 jpeg, Scan 2 is a 50mb Tiff that near on doesn't look like it needs editing to me. (both been compressed for here to 2mb for here)

•

konastab01 in reply to @doug1e

I always get Tiffs from Film Dev personal
•

miro_o in reply to @doug1e

Resolution is neither here nor there. Information is what you need in a scan (as in tonal info, picked up because it’s in the gamut that the scanner can pull-out). Either a scanner has the fucking bright light required for this or it doesn’t.

About

Avatar for doug1e @doug1e started