Scan 1 can look like scan 2 in processing easily, with detail to spare. Scan 2 has almost no room for improvement in processing. Which is the better scan?
Scan 1 is a 2000x3000 jpeg, Scan 2 is a 50mb Tiff that near on doesn't look like it needs editing to me. (both been compressed for here to 2mb for here)
Another way to look at it:
Scan 1 can look like scan 2 in processing easily, with detail to spare. Scan 2 has almost no room for improvement in processing. Which is the better scan?