-
They have the potential to change results, yes. For example, trump’s camp is asking courts to invalidate postal votes received the day after Election Day, and to order recounts in stations where there wasn’t a trump campaign observer. They might change the vote results just enough to get the necessary EC votes. It worked for Bush Jr. against Al Gore.
-
My take is that his lawyers will be looking for anything shady, like dead people voting or ballots received after the cut-off. Then they’ll try to use that as leverage to say the whole thing was rigged, Q anon conspiracy etc, Trump goes all out furhur, war with China, Jesus comes back, we all go to heaven.
-
Ex republican lawyer on the Beeb just now saying the value of the cases will come down to how close the results are. As i understood it his interpretation of close was a dispute of less than 1000 votes.
He also noted that some of the launched legal proceedings wouldn't (shouldn't) change the result.
Mildly relieving but then again Trump law.
-
Some legal bloke on the news here said that perhaps pennsylvania legal battles could amount to something eventually (but unlikely in his opinion) but said that the cases in other states would likely not see the courts
Have no idea of how correct his opinon info was tho
You are reading a single comment by @RonnieOatmilk and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Adhiero
jv
jono84
badboybjorn
@RonnieOatmilk
Will any of these legal cases actually go anywhere? Or is it PR thing?