The autism diagnosis is I think relevant. And it's not mentally ill. Autism is a neurological difference not a disease/mental illness.
But since the home office nearly deported a black autistic man because he was involved in theft of a mobile phone (he tried to stop it if parents are to believed) I am not convinced other factors don't play a role here.
The judge applied a law where you get seen as automatically part of the crime, that law is problematic of course and mostly affects certain groups.
Even leaving all that out: Poor family without massive legal funds VS family with good legal defense...
And that's why I am not convinced the autism diagnosis was applied equally, because what is really the lesser crime here? (IF and that is an IF he even was involved in stealing the phone)
The autism diagnosis is I think relevant. And it's not mentally ill. Autism is a neurological difference not a disease/mental illness.
But since the home office nearly deported a black autistic man because he was involved in theft of a mobile phone (he tried to stop it if parents are to believed) I am not convinced other factors don't play a role here.
The judge applied a law where you get seen as automatically part of the crime, that law is problematic of course and mostly affects certain groups.
Even leaving all that out: Poor family without massive legal funds VS family with good legal defense...