What do you want them to do - spend more and replace the frames and front door as well?
Maybe they are trying to do the bare minimum to get building regs approval without “unnecessary” costs? I am sure some leaseholders would support that strategy.
I want them to either do something meaningful with our money or not to waste it- my suspicion is that the current works are a waste of time and money as they do not go far enough, so I’d prefer they didn’t do them at all (too late now however) or, do them to a standard that has some meaning.
I hear you, but I think you have to figure out why they didn’t choose the ‘do nothing option’.
Part of it will be the fact that they take a margin on the overall project cost so are incentivised to inflate it, but there might be some reason in the regs to do it as well?
What do you want them to do - spend more and replace the frames and front door as well?
Maybe they are trying to do the bare minimum to get building regs approval without “unnecessary” costs? I am sure some leaseholders would support that strategy.