I think it is based on forcing businesses to make tough decisions, do you really want to keep lazy Dave because it was a bit of pain to get rid of him or he's been hear a long time when you are now going to have to overpay him for his output. It will force businesses to make 'efficiencies' which I guess is the intention but pretty shit for sectors like events and the arts where revenue is near zero now, so keeping people on will be incredibly hard.
It's a pretty short-sighted view of job protection either way.
One of the things I was mulling over recently is the implied fact that if you have a job you're worthy of protecting and if you've already lost your job, it's UBI and Fuck You Very Much
I think it is based on forcing businesses to make tough decisions, do you really want to keep lazy Dave because it was a bit of pain to get rid of him or he's been hear a long time when you are now going to have to overpay him for his output. It will force businesses to make 'efficiencies' which I guess is the intention but pretty shit for sectors like events and the arts where revenue is near zero now, so keeping people on will be incredibly hard.