Well, I don't agree with the usual 'people have got it wrong for so long that it must now be right' or 'it wasn't considered a mistake back then, so when people consider it a mistake nowadays they don't know the history'. The words quite simply have different origins, reflected in most Germanic languages, e.g. "liegen" ('to lie') and "legen" ('to lay') in German.
What happened is that they began to sound more alike, which is when the confusion crept in, and I have no doubt that at times people didn't pay much attention to it, but while it's a fairly inconsequential example, I generally think that different ideas should have different words, and I therefore think it's still very sensible to maintain the distinction between them. Plus, I rather like the participles of 'to lie' and I don't like monodirectional word takeovers ('to lie' isn't used in place of 'to lay'). :)
Well, I don't agree with the usual 'people have got it wrong for so long that it must now be right' or 'it wasn't considered a mistake back then, so when people consider it a mistake nowadays they don't know the history'. The words quite simply have different origins, reflected in most Germanic languages, e.g. "liegen" ('to lie') and "legen" ('to lay') in German.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/lay
https://www.etymonline.com/word/lie
What happened is that they began to sound more alike, which is when the confusion crept in, and I have no doubt that at times people didn't pay much attention to it, but while it's a fairly inconsequential example, I generally think that different ideas should have different words, and I therefore think it's still very sensible to maintain the distinction between them. Plus, I rather like the participles of 'to lie' and I don't like monodirectional word takeovers ('to lie' isn't used in place of 'to lay'). :)