-
I'd put aero on the tech side of things personally.
Honestly I think most criticisms of F1 could be solved by having a parallel spec series. Trying to regulate what constitutes a 'wing' and regulate aero would be an absolute nightmare IMO. I've been watching a fair bit of F2/F3 this season and it probably doesn't come as a surprise that the racing is much more enjoyable to watch.
mmccarthy-
Trying to regulate what constitutes a 'wing' and regulate aero would be an absolute nightmare IMO.
We managed it in RGB, so I doubt it would be that hard in F1. A wing is bodywork detached from the main structure of the car where air passes both under and over the bodywork in question. Job done. No wings.
-
P.S. Don't like spec series. Motorsport should have scope for technological improvement.
Brommers
I don't think it's the tech. I love the tech. It's the fact that aerodynamics and downforce matters more than anything else. Fixed capacity bucket of fuel, no electric drive, no wings, flat floor, go. That would be some good racing. Provided the bucket was big enough.