You are reading a single comment by @aggi and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Not long at all. A couple of years at the most. Compare this to the immense speed with which London has exploded in the last two decades.
That seems wildly optimistic. Assuming you could get companies to relocate instantaneously you'd still be massively short of infrastructure. Hospitals, schools, shops, public transport, etc
Not long at all. A couple of years at the most. Compare this to the immense speed with which London has exploded in the last two decades.
That's not a factor worth considering at all. If different people live somewhere, the culture will adapt. And I don't accept the very southern-centric idea that somehow the North is to looked down upon like that.
They are. There are hundreds of thousands of empty properties around the country. Thousands of buildings at risk. With a few exceptions (the biggest heritage cases) fixing up existing buildings is quicker and cheaper.
They talk just the same rubbish that everyone talks who accepts the false premise that there isn't enough housing. There's a conceptual sleight-of-hand here--of course, 'housing' must be that which is fit to live in, and many empty houses are not, so technically they don't count as 'housing'. That they can be fixed up means they are easily potential housing, though.
I'm very much afraid that I don't rate Shelter's 'expertise' in this at all. I could say more, but I won't.