-
It is related because you're doing exactly what Gove does - you have a fixed ideological view then ignore the facts on an issue and keep telling other people they are wrong and so are the experts.
Now you just shift to procedural points unrelated to the point at issue. And you ignore the point I made that the Shelter guy's press statement simply doesn't follow.
I don't have a fixed 'ideological' view. I've studied these issues intently for more than a decade. The conclusion is always the same. The underlying conditions need to be changed or the problem will never go away. And yes, they can be changed, but obviously not while Nonsense Johnson is in charge.
This isn't the first time either, it's a pattern.
See above.
Your point doesn't stand because I could link to 50 articles on how the solutions you propose are the solution aren't the solution, but I can't be bothered and you'd ignore them anyway.
I have absolutely no problem with advancing a minority point. Again, for escaping to mere procedure, and ad hominem, see above. Stick to the issue and you will very quickly see that I have a point.
Much easier to ignore you.
Well, I won't ignore you.
You are reading a single comment by @Oliver Schick and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Oliver Schick
It is related because you're doing exactly what Gove does - you have a fixed ideological view then ignore the facts on an issue and keep telling other people they are wrong and so are the experts.
This isn't the first time either, it's a pattern.
Your point doesn't stand because I could link to 50 articles on how the solutions you propose are the solution aren't the solution, but I can't be bothered and you'd ignore them anyway.
Much easier to ignore you.