You are reading a single comment by @Oliver Schick and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Without wishing to start an argument, what’s ‘disastrous’ about it? Is it one of those things that sounds good in principle (ie repurpose over-shopped areas creating needed housing) but falls down at a micro level?

  • It's not necessarily the worst thing for Central London, where more residential and less commercial wouldn't actually be a bad thing, but overwhelmingly it'll create slums, e.g. where former commercial buildings in far-from-anywhere industrial estates are converted into shoebox-size 'flats'. In general, in an already far too developer-friendly planning system, which, as hoefla says, is in terrible disarray, removing even more safeguards against bad development is something only total idiots want.

About