-
• #46877
Another nicknamed after JPS, the Seiko 6138-8039
2 Attachments
-
• #46878
Woof. (Adds to Seiko list)
-
• #46879
I'll just leave this here
-
• #46880
Watches are an application where I am pretty certain that steel is superior to carbon.
-
• #46881
Blue lagoon but it’s just blue sea
1 Attachment
-
• #46882
Did a watch manufacturer really omit the word "time" from their copy?
"We were ready to bring our watch to market some ago but"
-
• #46883
48 mm wtf
-
• #46885
Not so much a manufacturer.
Fair play to the guy but I can't see these selling
-
• #46886
Yup, surely not aero.
-
• #46887
Got some 22mm straps for sale from a watch I no longer own, anyone would like any?
Zuludiver Tropic Style Strap, used for a week, super comfortable - £20 posted
George’s Straps green fancy NATO, never used - sold
Barton Khaki Canvas Strap with QR, used for 2 days, again extremely comfortable - £15 posted?
Thanks
2 Attachments
-
• #46888
What's the width on the middle one? Dibs if 18mm
-
• #46889
Got some 22mm straps for sale
-
• #46890
Thanks :-)
-
• #46891
Rhetorical obvs.
Ta :oP
-
• #46892
I’ll take the green NATO - pm incoming.
-
• #46893
Sure, all yours.
-
• #46894
Any more pictures of the Longines big eye? Water resistance puts me off a bit
-
• #46895
30m is pretty standard with the chronograph watches, isn’t it? It’s not like you accidentally fall into the water on a daily basis. And if you do - I’d be more worried about the phone than the watch.
-
• #46896
Plus if its 3bar, its easily good for 5meters and I'd like to see where you'll accidentally fall into water of 5 meters, even going swimming. Even at 10m more so. Approaching 30m?! Nah...
-
• #46897
At 30m you are basically dead
-
• #46898
Yup.
-
• #46899
I think 30m of WR is code for “splashproof” to be honest. I wouldn’t worry about washing your hands wearing it but I wouldn’t go swimming and expect it to hold up.
FYI this is why divers watches > chronographs. [winking emoji]
-
• #46900
Or the best of both worlds
As opposed to the Silk Cut Day Date