Isn't it also that Pantani's just a more appealing flawed hero from a narrative point of view? He looked like he was suffering, and struggled for his wins, rather than just dominating. The tragic end means it's easier to forgive his flaws compared to someone like Armstrong, who dominated whilst also being an aggressive arsehole.
Isn't it also that Pantani's just a more appealing flawed hero from a narrative point of view? He looked like he was suffering, and struggled for his wins, rather than just dominating. The tragic end means it's easier to forgive his flaws compared to someone like Armstrong, who dominated whilst also being an aggressive arsehole.