You are reading a single comment by @gbj_tester and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I think they started with the MTB groups first but yeah they're moving their whole range onto it.

    I'm sure it will be nice in the long run. You know for sure you can fit the cranks to any frame without compatibility issues, you get the oversize stiffer axle and reduced weight like BB30 but now for BSA too without BSA30 BBs.

    But right now when everyone has other standards and wants to stick with them, it's just annoying

  • You know for sure you can fit the cranks to any frame without compatibility issues

    No you can't, it still won't go in stupid BB86/92 frames. DUB does nothing that 386Evo wasn't already doing perfectly well, it just ties you to bike-specific bearings rather than generic 30mm ID cartridges, so they can charge three times the proper price every time you replace them

  • Edit: Stupid question

  • DUB does nothing that 386Evo wasn't already doing perfectly well

    This is what I don't get, particularly when SRAM was already making 386EVO compatible cranks. Do you know what marketing bullshit SRAM came up with to justify not simply adopting 386EVO?

    Still, another reason for the No More SRAM rule a.k.a. The Bauke Mollema principle. Not that another was really necessary.

About

Avatar for gbj_tester @gbj_tester started