You are reading a single comment by @groakden and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I'm very similar (except for long arms), I'd consider the large Surly sizes too long although 62 may be ok, but that's based on my preferences.
Do you have an idea of ideal stack and reach? If so https://www.cyclingabout.com/list-of-xxl-xxxl-bikes-for-tall-cyclists-62-63-64cm/ is my go-to whenever thinking about a new bike
EDIT: Just looked, the Surly is 6 cm lower and 2 cm longer than my ideal but within the range I've ridden (and enjoyed)
pjhobs
@groakden
Looking for advice for a new frame please. I’m 6’6” and have always struggled getting the right fit. I’ve got fairly long legs and I suppose comparably short torso/arms. I’ll be using it for commuting mainly and also to go on decentish rides. Would like a fairly upright position as my back suffers on a long cycle.
I’ve been looking at a Surly Steamroller, as this is about bang on what I’m looking to spend (£500). However the 62cm frame seems to have a hefty top tube.
Alu or steel, not fussed.
Also been looking at the All City Big Block.