Crass and insensitive aren’t the harshest criticisms and itsbruce has stated that they think no offence was intended so I think this is all balanced and valid.
On the other side I’d argue depicting Muhammed and making reference to a depiction of Muhammed are two different things. Where do you draw the line?
I wouldn’t pass that joke on as I understand it is dodgy to use the initial word which I guess is the point. But at the same time I think taking offence to it would be a strong viewpoint to have. Is saying that religion is stupid any different ? Why is one okay and the other not?
It’s an interesting discussion.
Crass and insensitive aren’t the harshest criticisms and itsbruce has stated that they think no offence was intended so I think this is all balanced and valid.
On the other side I’d argue depicting Muhammed and making reference to a depiction of Muhammed are two different things. Where do you draw the line?
I wouldn’t pass that joke on as I understand it is dodgy to use the initial word which I guess is the point. But at the same time I think taking offence to it would be a strong viewpoint to have. Is saying that religion is stupid any different ? Why is one okay and the other not?
All interesting and I see both sides here.