Science, Statistics and Studies [SARS-CoV-2]

Checking out poopy water suggests that C19 was in Italy in December.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-53106444

[Deleted by moderator as unscientific]

Are you so incredibly stupid that you're unable to read or understand the abstract of the paper you posted a link to, or are you just so stupid that you repost shit you simply don't understand but are taken in by because you're a gullible credulous moron?

.

Try taking your own advice. This is a thread for Covid19 science and studies. Not conspiracy theories peddled by dumbfucks with limited literacy skills.

This conspiracy theory is the one that the former MI6 Director was banging on about recently. Its utter drivel.

https://fullfact.org/health/richard-dearlove-coronavirus-claims/

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/09/conspiracies-covid-19-lab-false-pandemic

Again can you stick to the tread topic..

*peer reviewed science

Oh do fuck off troll. Go fuck yourself right out of here.

[Deleted by moderator as unscientific]

Except that the scientific and medical community and the authors of the paper disagree with you.

peer reviewed science

.

The final draft has been out for a couple of weeks, apparently it was re-written a number of times to make it less incendiary and is only now being fully understood.

Take your own advice, If it is still in draft then it is not peer-reviewed yet.

Are we still doing protein sequence alignments in blast?

(it's been a long long time)

@user62119 I've deleted both of the posts you made as both are severely flawed in their conclusion.

Falsifiable is not the same as flawed.

I would be happy for you to post papers that do this, rather than censor.
That is how science works.

There aren't that many papers right now. There's an awful lot of preprints that are being shared as papers. They've not been peer reviewed properly, they're still in prepub.
That's how science publishing works.

The preprint you showed was accepted as this:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DBBC0FA6E3763B0067CAAD8F3363E527/S2633289220000083a.pdf/biovacc19_a_candidate_vaccine_for_covid19_sarscov2_developed_from_analysis_of_its_general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf

Can you tell me what bits you're reading to get "bioengineered" and "human meddling" please?

Do not feed the troll...

Yes. You're right.

Im out.

peer reviewed papers

Except it's not, and you misinterpreted both the abstract and conclusion in any case.

Im out.

The conversation will be better for it.

personal insults to remain

You're a ballbag

Except it's not,

You are at least the third person to point this out, possibly the 4th. All studiously ignored. So either a troll or someone with a preconceived agenda.

ballbag

.

Brace yourself, winter is coming:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.11.20147157v2

There was also a corresponding decrease in the rate of deaths (mortality) from the disease, with a roughly 15% drop in mortality for every one degree Celsius rise in temperature. By contrast, the severity of symptoms and mortality rate remained constant in China during the first wave of the pandemic, which occurred solely throughout the winter.

These changes were too large to be explained by improvements in treatment of COVID-19, patient age or hospitals becoming overwhelmed during this time, suggesting that there is a seasonal influence on the virus.

If this holds true then nations with lower temps should have more severe covid mortality rates. That does not seem to be the case does it?

It gets complicated when it’s hot enough to require air conditioning and people live in a society where you just move from one air conditioned bubble to another.