-
• #14302
.
-
• #14303
I heard somewhere that there's been an overall reduction in all other infections since covid19 that can't really be explained. Like they've been displaced by it.
That true?
Not a reliable source, so just wondering if it's worth pondering over.
-
• #14304
People aren't being quite as filthy as usual.
-
• #14305
Some people.
-
• #14306
Social distancing, isolation, shielding and a huge improvement in personal hygiene (washing their hands) will have a huge effect on reducing the amount of infections of various diseases going round.
Covid-19 hasn't displaced it but the measures put in place to contain Covid-19 will have.
I heard recently that Norovirus (Winter Vomiting Bug) is a fraction of the number of cases usually seen (either in hospitals or in the general public). A lot of this will be down to the fact that many people are washing their hands after being outside.
-
• #14307
fair enough... Makes sense.
-
• #14308
Johnson gives the OK for sex bubbles and going to the zoo. This is all so weird.
-
• #14309
David Cameron will be rubbing his hands...
-
• #14310
Single people can "form a bubble with another household". What does this even mean?
-
• #14311
-
• #14312
Glad I'm not single
-
• #14313
That looks like 1 double person
-
• #14314
Singles can hang out with one other single without distancing etc. But you have to stick with that one. So choose carefully.
-
• #14315
And if they don't get on they get turned into an animal?
-
• #14316
And we are back to David Cameron.
-
• #14317
Lol
-
• #14318
Convinced they have a bag with different phrases: pick three randomly for that day's announcement.
-
• #14319
Human centipede style
-
• #14320
Whats this wack a mole bollox all about?
-
• #14321
how accurate are venous? any chance of false positive? my sister just had one today (NHS nurse) along with 700 other staff
-
• #14322
http://www.iomtoday.co.im/article.cfm?id=56160
Social distancing no longer a legal requirement.
22 days case free. Borders remain closed, mainly until you lot sort your shit out.
All feels a little too easy. -
• #14323
Lots of hospitals are screening staff for antibodies, 10 mls venous blood I think. Meant to be pretty accurate, not had any info from our trust about specificity (which from memory is the false positive rate.
-
• #14324
mainly until you lot sort your shit out.
-
• #14325
The Roche and Abbott antibody tests using venous blood are way more accurate than the home antibody test kits that Superdrug etc were selling. The home tests tried to get about 6ml blood from fingerpricking and ending up with loads of contaminated samples.
There's an unknown (to me, yet) false negative and false positive rate for the tests. Thing is, I think you have to just accept the result as it is (as either way it's going to make little difference on an individual level).
Capilliary (finger prick) blood or venous blood sample?
https://www.abbott.co.uk/media-center/news/statement-from-abbott-on-use-of-Abbott-Architect-SARS-COV-2-antibody-test-with-home-kits.html