-
Well the ecoffee example is the most readily available one right now.
He said something had been proven to be dangerous to someone's health, and it hadn't been.
@nefarious - yes I understand, I'm not under any illusions as to the nature of YouTube. My issue is the way he quite regularly says stuff under the guise of scientific method when it's just him trying to validate his own opinions about things. Yeah, it's frivolous because it's about the subject of coffee but it's dangerous when it gets put into other environments i.e. anti-vaxxers and that kinda stuff.
It's a bit of a leap granted, but all this stuff irks me. I'm a scientist and the way he dresses up his presentations really bothers me.
gorgonzolach-
"He regularly dots his videos citing scientific method and facts either wrongly or just sometimes making it up." yet you can't provide another example except for the thing he's apologising for? I've only watched a couple of his vids but if you're gonna slate some dude for being regularly inaccurate I'd rather hope that you're not being inaccurate.
hippy
Such as?