-
Well if you were told by others to leave the whole thing why answer? Who were these others, why not name names?
You are missing the point completely, that people found it acceptable to troll that thread and not fear or have any come back is the point. The mocking of the posters on depression thread after immature (at the best)on the football thread was acceptable, then going on to deride posters on the depression thread was acceptable. That seems to be missed, or overlooked as the ones that did it were the 'OG'. Mocking people who posted on that thread seems to be missed too. You and I have both posted on that thread, would it be any way acceptable for me to mock or deride you for anything you posted on that thread? But I won't go on as others have put me down, my opinion of what counts as morals is to be mocked.
Here is one to think about, next time you see me Tim (yes I'm using your name as others do to make it more personal) don't acknowledge me. Will do the same and I'll make sure never to speak to you or about you again. Maybe you can give me the same curtesy. If you can not at least say things to my face.
lynx-
Maybe you can give me the same curtesy.
(
) -
Well if you were told by others to leave the whole thing why answer? Who were these others, why not name names?
All the people who mentioned the last couple of pages that enough had been said on both sides of peoples opinions of Uber, not someone telling me not talk about the shitty trolling of the Depression thread.
I literally called out Pistinator at the time, questioning why the forum even had a rules post if it was one set of rules for friends and another set of rules for everyone else.
Brommers
branwen
I didn't want to reply to this since I was told by others to leave this whole thing, but since you're asking again- does the fact that someone did a good thing 8 years ago somehow absolve them from all criticism going forward?
Yes it was good that he stood up, but you're making it sound as if he was the only brave soul who did it, and that it somehow means we should ignore his behaviour in the intervening years