-
No thats what concerns me (well not only for sweden but for the world). It would have been much better if the virus had a large spread everywhere all rdy (obviously since lower death rate) but also like u say, that makes u wonder about our 30% with antibodies in stockholm since this was a projection from a rather small group of testing in comparison to the spain survey for instance. But they have been in complete lockdown since late march or similar? So i still have some hope that the stockholm numbers can hold somewhat true when they release the next test results after the weekend.
There was also that german study of village that found 15%? had had it and only a mortality rate of about .3% or similar which makes one wonder how it can differ so much. Are the tests they used in spain not reliable perhaps? not picking up on every case?
Theres also places like india that leaves me somewhat puzzled.. how can the slum of the big cities in india not produce massive deaths way way higher than beeing reported.
Its like there are factors in this virus that are not yet understood at all. There is otherwise no logic or way to little accurate data at least.
The news just said that spain had done a large antibody test on their population. Think around 60k random tests and found only 5% with antibodies.
Thats not great news considering the amount of deaths they have had ;/
Hopefully this data (or the representation by the news) Is missing some info that makes it look worse that it actually is.