Aside from hubs failing suddenly (and often inexplicably), I find that the inner cables have a tendency to get jammed in the shifter- then because the shifter is made of plastic one wrong twist can mangle the shifter internals, meaning the whole thing has to be replaced.
I find the whole cable changing procedure quite unpleasant. the gear range is somewhat narrow. The pawls in the freehub fail. There’s no system to drain and change the hub oil.
I haven’t tried the new cargo specific range of Nuvinci hubs- maybe they’ve sorted them out a bit?
I’m not familiar with those two models of Mercedes, so your analogy is a bit lost on me :). I’m comparing rohloff and Nuvinci (which are the only two I’ve tried) and from that would say the rohloff is worth the extra expense if it can be spared.
Agreed, Nuvinci sucks. The amount of flex inside the hub is also insane. Had it on a Butchers and Bikes for work a little while back. If the motor battery died, it felt like trying to ride it under water with a rubber band instead of gates belt.
My experience with Nuvinci hasn’t been great.
Aside from hubs failing suddenly (and often inexplicably), I find that the inner cables have a tendency to get jammed in the shifter- then because the shifter is made of plastic one wrong twist can mangle the shifter internals, meaning the whole thing has to be replaced.
I find the whole cable changing procedure quite unpleasant. the gear range is somewhat narrow. The pawls in the freehub fail. There’s no system to drain and change the hub oil.
I haven’t tried the new cargo specific range of Nuvinci hubs- maybe they’ve sorted them out a bit?
I’m not familiar with those two models of Mercedes, so your analogy is a bit lost on me :). I’m comparing rohloff and Nuvinci (which are the only two I’ve tried) and from that would say the rohloff is worth the extra expense if it can be spared.