-
But immediate total lockdown at an early enough stage to really prevent much spread would have seen as alarmist.
This shower of shit choosing optics over competence every single time is one of the reasons we're so angry at them.
And now they've also completely failed at the optics parts I don't know what the point of them is.
grams-
But immediate total lockdown at an early enough stage to really prevent much spread would have seen as alarmist.
This shower of shit choosing optics over competence every single time is one of the reasons we're so angry at them.
But there have been lots of potential pandemics. If the response to the first slightest sign of a potential pandemic was instant lockdown that would be a bad policy. They didn't choose optics over action, they made a difficult call that everyone is now criticising in hindsight.
ffm
But immediate total lockdown at an early enough stage to really prevent much spread would have seen as alarmist.