You are reading a single comment by @Brommers and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • It is common, broadly for the reasons you describe - there's a risk that a cohabitee can obtain an equitable interest in the property by living there and contributing to costs.

  • They could, but that beneficial interest wouldn't take priority over a prior legal charge in favour of the lender. The bank might have a genuine interest in having any co-occupiers disclaim any equitable rights on a remortgage but once the legal charge is in place the lender's position is safe.

    I suppose the lender might just be being ultra-cautious.

About

Avatar for Brommers @Brommers started