• Not entirely true.

    That’s not worse outcome that’s just the outcome. Deaths after discharge are horrible but don’t suggest the world is getting worse at dealing with the disease. Even if they were to become a pattern that would be seem and acted upon.

    Sorry if I’m coming across as a dick. I just find the idea that’s delay is not to an advantage ridiculous. If there is an argument against delay then by all means make it.

    You can take any aspect of the problem and see how time is advantageous. Simple tracking mechanisms for instance.

  • It’s ridiculous because you don’t want to acknowledge that there are any issues with lockdown and or the economic impacts, if you can’t begin to identify any yourself what hope does anyone else have?

    Added; that’s not meant to sound shouty if it does sorry!

  • Don’t be daft. I’ve never denied there are costs to a lockdown. Most of us are aware, we’re directly effected.

    You asked why we are locked down and not open now. It’s a fair question ‘because there is capacity’. I suggest you re-engage with current affairs and you’ll get a view of what’s actually happening.

About