-
just because you might not get your costs back isn't a great reason to let his bullshit continue on unchecked
It's not a great reason, but it's a good one. A basic rule of business is that any action should have a cost:benefit<1, and instructing solicitors to commence a defamation action against hambini is unlikely to meet that test.
I'm just talking about the question of defamation, which is expensive to prosecute and uncertain in outcome. There might be other avenues to reduce hambini's ability to get his message out which do stand up to cost:benefit analysis. Apparently Twitter already think they're better off without him, maybe YouTube will too if his descent into madness continues and enough people file reports of possible ToS violations.
gbj_tester-
his account is still active on Twitter - https://twitter.com/HambiniENG
and still tweeting shite...
deleted
I'd say aerocoach would have a reasonable claim to probable financial loss tbh, and just because you might not get your costs back isn't a great reason to let his bullshit continue on unchecked imo.