-
Why, is that the situation @Dammit is in?
I believe so. I'd have thought, unless the freehold directors have collectively gone loopy, they would be quite interested and possibly slightly disturbed by their agent attacking one of their stakeholders.
-
I believe so. I'd have thought, unless the freehold directors have collectively gone loopy, they would be quite interested and possibly slightly disturbed by their agent attacking one of their stakeholders.
Our directors are a classic example of what I believe is known as "regulatory capture", they are the lick-spittles and boot-licks of the managing agent.
Hence my loss of temper a little while ago with the managing director of the residents committee, which I believe that Matt overheard.
-
Very much so. Sorry, I didn't realise that - been very busy at work so not been keeping up here.
So @Dammit take my post with a pinch of salt then - they'll want to have a word with their lawyers if they're really going after a co-freeholder.
I've never lived in that sort of environment but I'd imagine very low. It only tends to be the Moskovitzes of the world who are prepared to waste both their money and tribunal's time on no hope cases for no other apparent reason than to punish independently-minded leaseholders. Why, is that the situation @Dammit is in?