-
• #27
I'm pretty satisfied with it. weight was as low as claimed. since I used it only on my singlespeed build, it was strengthwise totally fine for my purpose. of course it has stretched a lil' but it still serves me well.
-
• #28
it has stretched a lil'
actually mate actually i think you'll find actually actually what's happened actually is that the pins and bushings have actually worn, creating the illusion that the chain has stretched. this is something that i independently observed and NOT AT ALL something that i recently read on the internet and feel compelled to point out every time i see this COMMON MISCONCEPTION.
the good news is that you're saving weight further by gently grinding precious molecules of steel off your chain parts.
-
• #29
Running a small ring and cog is the only way you are going to notice weight savings on a chain.
Sram s300 ss cranks are well priced and include external bb. An immediate weight save you can actually feel plus chainring is 3/32.
-
• #30
of course, you're right. forces are not strong enough to actually "stretch" the plates of the links. one should rather speak of chain wear which is measurable with a chain wear indicator.
-
• #31
forces are not strong enough to actually "stretch" the plates of the links
Speak for yourself.
-
• #33
I know, just flexing. I was insinuating that I have enough power that I can actually stretch chains.
-
• #34
💪
@FlowRider How did you get on with the Gusset Expresso?