-
• #9727
Now this thing is bigger than Cancer.
Rhythm is a dancer.
-
• #9728
I would have thought SARs was a reasonable warning! Although I obviously have no idea if a SARs vaccine had been found whether it would provide any help finding a Sars-Cov-2 vaccine.
-
• #9729
I would have thought SARs was a reasonable warning!
Try getting money for research that might not yield anything for a disease that statistically nobody gets.
-
• #9730
I think it's lunchtime right?
Who's hungry? Have we had a drink? -
• #9731
Brothers & Sisters, why are we allowing Corona to tear us apart like this :'(
-
• #9732
Ha - I realised my tone sounded pissy when I re-read it. Thanks for the link - interesting.
-
• #9733
Cabin fever
-
• #9735
I'm pissed because Gails in Maida Vale is still open.
-
• #9736
Is alright. I'm immune to this.
WAKKA WAKKA
Also. I've been banging links from lots of different places today.here's a quick bit of a summary
NIH - what it is and what's being done therapeutically
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/coronavirusesBecause we're talking new technologies (and coronavirus in human vaccines haven't been successful) i read this
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00827-6Which uses every fanboys favourite biotech CRISPR as a detection tool.
Which makes me think positive vibes
-
• #9737
Yes, because we've had no reason to do it - who's going to work on that when they could work on Cancer?
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. 4 common human coronaviruses form part of the collection of viruses we collectively refer to as the common cold. Considerable amounts of time and effort have been spent trying to develop vaccines. None have succeeded. Considerable efforts were also made to finding a SARS vaccine. There is none.
Maybe this time it'll be different, but the assumption that we'll be able to find a vaccine against SARS2 because we've been able to develop vaccines for other entirely different types of virus is quite a leap of faith. And as we know from HIV, throwing vast amounts and money and time at a problem doesn't necessarily result in an effective vaccine.
-
• #9738
+rep
For a moment I thought that was by Corona (got it confused for their cover of Rhythm of the Night) which would've been perfect.
-
• #9739
BREAKING: Iain Duncan Smith declares the PM “fit for work”
-
• #9740
4 common human coronaviruses form part of the collection of viruses we collectively refer to as the common cold.
That considerable effort would have been proportionate to the impact the Common Cold has on the population. I mean, who would buy a vaccine for the common cold. Unless there's a lethal or highly debilitating strain I've missed.
Considerable efforts were also made to finding a SARS vaccine. There is none.
Yes, but now time has moved on, and we find Europe and the US is unable to leave the house. As above, what was a tiny blip barely on the radar, is now the biggest thing going. Where big efforts have been made, you can be sure bigger efforts will be made. The prize is fucking massive, there has never been anything like it. This is a good thing, a reason to be hopeful.
the assumption that we'll be able to find a vaccine against SARS2 because we've been able to develop vaccines for other entirely different types of virus is quite a leap of faith.
Yes, but this is not where I place all my faith, perhaps my post did not make that clear.
-
• #9741
Ha!
-
• #9743
Oooh dat olive bread
-
• #9744
Interesting train of thought. A counter would be that we will certainly get better at cluster detection and snubbing out new spread. That might allow us to go on without an eventual vaccine.
-
• #9745
Can understand being scared. You must be brave to get involved.
-
• #9746
But as time goes on then doesn’t the reward?
-
• #9747
Individuals don’t have GDPR responsibilities for private unverified conversations they’re on the receiving end of, about information neither they nor their employers are controllers of.
-
• #9748
For the common cold? Nope.
-
• #9749
No for this
-
• #9750
BREAKING: Iain Duncan Smith declares the PM “fit for work”
Hah thank fuck some actual lols
Oh really? Never would have thought!
(If you think my understanding of this is so limited, if I were you I simply wouldn't have replied.)
Yes, because we've had no reason to do it - who's going to work on that when they could work on Cancer?
Now this thing is bigger than Cancer. Cancer, AIDS, Dementia, Malaria, Heart Disease, Alzheimers.... everything.
It's better than a complete absence of any large scale effective vaccine I think.