@danstuff @mespilus the key point in the piece for me, was the duration period on different surfaces and key transmission points, not whether it’s DNA, RNA living or not.
Given that quite a lot of it is very obviously utter bollocks, how reliable do you think the figures and facts in the rest of it are? I use the word 'facts' in the loosest possible way.
@danstuff @mespilus the key point in the piece for me, was the duration period on different surfaces and key transmission points, not whether it’s DNA, RNA living or not.