You are reading a single comment by @Brommers and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
It's not, relevant, that is. Whether or not a virus is living largely depends on how you define the word 'living', as Wittgenstein would probably point out if he was on LFGSS.
Brommers-
Whether or not a virus is living largely depends on how you define the word 'living', as Wittgenstein would probably point out if he was on LFGSS.
That was my point, but the article seems to think its important, since it mentions that it isn't living more than once. I just find it slightly bizarre, but pretty benign
mespilus
Sifta
Seems to be quite hung up on whether COVID is 'living' or not, which although an interesting subject to debate, doesn't seem to be that relevant?